Multidimensional Prognostic Index Research Articles

Resilience improvement through a multicomponent physical and cognitive intervention for older people: the DanzArTe emotional well-being technology project

BackgroundResilience is a crucial component of successful aging. However, which interventions might increase resilience in older adults is yet unclear.AimsThis study aims to assess the feasibility and the physical and psychological effects of a technology-based multicomponent dance movement intervention that includes physical, cognitive, and sensory activation in older people living in community-dwelling and nursing home.MethodsDanzArTe program consists of four sessions on a weekly basis, using a technological platform that integrates visual and auditory contents in real time. 122 participants (mean age = 76.3 ± 8.8 years, 91 females = 74.6%) from seven nursing homes and community-dwelling subjects were assessed, before and after the intervention, with the Resilience Scale-14 items (RES-14), the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI-S), and the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8). Mann–Whitney and Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests were used for statistical analyses.ResultsAt baseline significant differences in MPI and RES-14 between community-dwelling and nursing home residents were observed (p < 0.001 for both analyses). After the intervention, resilience significantly increased in total sample (RES-14 mean T1 = 74.6 Vs. T2 = 75.7) and in the nursing home residents (RES-14 mean T1 = 68.1 Vs. T2 = 71.8). All participants showed high overall satisfaction for DanzArTe program (CSQ-8 mean = 23.9 ± 4.4). No differences in MPI and PGWBI-S were observed.DiscussionDanzArTe was a feasible intervention and high appreciated by all older adults. Nursing home residents revealed improvements in resilience after DanzArTe program.ConclusionThe DanzArTe technology-based multi-component intervention may improve resilience in older people living in nursing homes.

The Association Between Multidimensional Frailty and Poor Venous Accesses in a Geriatric Population: A Retrospective Study.

Since the association between frailty and difficulty in finding venous access (VA) is largely unexplored and unclear in geriatrics, the aim of this study is to demonstrate how multidimensional frailty is associated with bad VA in a population of older hospitalized people. Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), based on eight different domains usually assessed in comprehensive geriatric assessment, was used for identifying multidimensional frailty; VA heritage was investigated using a questionnaire prepared by a trained nurse, based on clinical experience. Overall, 145 patients were included (mean age 78.6 ± 7.6; males 51.0%). Frailer people, identified as an MPI >0.66 (MPI 3), had a significantly higher presence of bad VA (49.0% vs. 27.3% in MPI 3 and MPI 1 groups, p = 0.045), no success at first attempt (49.0% vs. 22.7% in MPI 3 and MPI 1 groups, p = 0.03), reported more frequently pain during VA attempts (63.3% in MPI 3 vs. 27.3 in MPI 1, p = 0.002), and significantly higher scores in the Numeric Rating Scale compared to their robust counterparts. Taking robust participants in MPI 1 as reference, after adjusting for potential confounders, frailer people (MPI 3) were at increased odds of bad VA (odds ratio [OR] = 2.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-6.41; p = 0.02), not success at first attempt (OR = 3.67; 95% CI: 1.09-12.57; p = 0.04), and presence of pain during VA attempt (OR = 4.26; 95% CI: 1.30-13.92; p = 0.02). In conclusion, our study demonstrated an association between multidimensional frailty and bad VA in a population of older hospitalized people.

Role of geriatric assessment and oncological multidimensional prognostic index (Onco-MPI) in a real-world cohort of elderly patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Role of geriatric assessment and oncological multidimensional prognostic index (Onco-MPI) in a real-world cohort of elderly patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

The importance of prognosis in geriatric patients attending the emergency department: a comparison between two common short geriatric assessment tools

BackgroundThe use of short geriatric tools in the emergency department (ED) is increasing, but the literature is still conflicting. The aim of this study is to compare the precision and the accuracy of two short geriatric assessment tools to predict mortality in a cohort of older patients attending the ED.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted including patients ≥ 65 years, attending the ED and transferred to a medical assessment unit from February to July 2022. Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Brief Multidimensional Prognostic Index (Brief MPI) were administered. The association between Brief MPI and CFS and mortality was analysed via area under the curve (AUC) with its 95% confidence intervals (CIs), the C-statistics and a multivariate Cox’s regression analysis, in the latter case reporting the data as hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% CI.ResultsAmong the 579 patients enrolled (mean age: 77 years), both Brief MPI and CFS showed a good accuracy in predicting mortality (AUC: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61–0.83 for Brief MPI; 0.754; 95% CI: 0.65–0.83 for CFS). The discrimination of Brief MPI and CFS in predicting mortality was excellent, since the C-index of the Brief MPI was 0.85 and of CFS = 0.84. In the multivariate analysis, the risk for mortality was significantly increased for frailer subjects (HR 4.65; 95% CI: 1.45–15.00 for Brief MPI > 0.66; HR = 9.24; 95% CI: 1.16–76.90 for CFS > 6).ConclusionsBrief MPI and CFS showed a good accuracy/precision to predict mortality in older patients attending the ED. Considering that they are quick to perform, their introduction in ED clinical practice could be extremely helpful.

Validation of a Brief Form of the Self-Administered Multidimensional Prognostic Index: The SELFY-BRIEF-MPI Project.

In clinical practice, self-administered and brief tools to promptly identify older people at risk of frailty are required. The Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), derived from the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) seems reliable enough to serve this purpose, but despite the several versions developed over the past 15 years, it lacks a self-administered and brief version. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the agreement between an abbreviated form of the SELFY-MPI (i.e., SELFY-BRIEF-MPI) and the standard version of the MPI. Four Italian hospitals consecutively enrolled outpatients and inpatients >65 years. The sample included 105 participants (mean age = 78.8 years, 53.3% females). Overall, the two versions showed non-statistically significant differences (Standard-MPI 0.42 ± 0.19 vs.. SELFY-BRIEF-MPI 0.41 ± 0.18; p = 0.104) and a very strong correlation (R = 0.86, p < 0.001). The Bland-Altman Plot revealed that only 5/105 measurements (4.76%) were outside the limits of agreement. The accuracy of the SELFY-BRIEF-MPI in identifying frail people (defined as a Standard-MPI > 0.66) was optimal (area under the curve, AUC = 0.90, p < 0.001). To predict multidimensional frailty, a SELFY-BRIEF-MPI score of 0.60 exhibited the greatest sensitivity/specificity ratio. In conclusion, the SELFY-BRIEF-MPI reported a good agreement with the standard version of the MPI, indicating its application in the screening of multidimensional frailty among older people.

Can the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) be a predictive instrument for mortality in older adult liver transplant candidates?

Key summary pointsAimThe aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of the Liver Frailty Index (LFI) and the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) as predictors of mortality in a cohort of older adult patients being evaluated for liver transplantationFindingsOn the 68 patients studied, ROC curve analysis showed that MPI was similar or slightly better than LFI as predictor of mortality (AUC 0.7, p=0.007, and AUC 0.689, p=0.015, respectively).MessageIn older people patients listed for liver transplantation, MPI is as good a prognostic tool as LFI for predicting mortality.

Orthogeriatric Assessment of the Elderly Patient with Fragility Hip Fracture: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study.

Nowadays, more studies deal with "OrthoGeriatrics", for the co-management of elderly patients suffering fractures, from the admission to the discharge and beyond. For the first time at Cagliari University Hospital, we introduced an orthogeriatric service, in which trained geriatricians stay in orthopedic unit alongside trained orthopedics. The primary aim of the study was to analyze the rate of death and rehospitalization in elderly femur-fractured people of 65 or more years of age, identifying possible predictive factors. The secondary aim of the study was to analyze the recovery of daily living autonomies during the months following surgery. To reach the aim, we designed a prospective study, which is currently ongoing. We evaluated femur-fractured patients aged 65 years or more with a comprehensive geriatric assessment before surgery. The most common fractures were lateral hip ones, treated with osteosynthesis. Cognitive-affective, functional, and nutritional status, mood, and comorbidities were less impaired than in the outpatient service of the same hospital devoted to frail elderly. Pain control was excellent. A significantly low delirium incidence was found. More than a third of the sample were recognized as frail (according to the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe-Frailty Instrument (SHARE-FI)), and over a third of the sample were identified as a moderate-high risk of hospitalization and death (according to Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI)). Overall mortality rate was 13.87%, and rehospitalization rate was 11.84%. Frail people were more likely to die than non-frail (HR: 5.64), and pre-frail ones (HR: 3.97); similarly, high-risk patients were more likely to die than low-risk (HR: 8.04), and moderate-risk ones (HR: 5.46). Conversely, neither SHARE-FI nor MPI predicted rehospitalization. Creatinine (OR: 2.66, p = 0.003) and folate (OR: 0.75, p = 0.03) levels were independently associated with death and rehospitalization, respectively. Finally, the patients did recover the lost autonomies later, 6 months after surgery. Our study demonstrated that SHARE-FI and MPI are reliable tools to predict mortality in an orthogeriatric setting, and that creatinine and folate levels should also be measured given their independent association with negative outcomes.

The multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) predicts long-term mortality in old type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a 13-year follow-up study

PurposeThe Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) is a tool capable of holistically frame older patients in different settings and affected by different pathologies, establishing a risk of adverse events. Among them, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a common metabolic disease in the elderly, is responsible for complications and deaths. Few previous works have focused specifically on MPI and DM, and none have followed up the patients for more than 3 years. The aim of the present study is to analyze MPI accuracy in predicting mortality in a cohort of T2DM patients followed-up for 13 years.MethodsThe enrolled subjects were evaluated with MPI, identifying three levels of risk: MPI1 (low risk, 0.0–0.33), MPI2 (moderate risk, 0.34–0.66), and MPI3 (severe risk, 0.67–1.0), and with glycated hemoglobin, and years since T2DM diagnosis.ResultsOne hundred and seven patients met the inclusion criteria. MPI3 was excluded by further analysis since it was made up of only three patients. Overall, cognitive performances, autonomies in daily living, nutritional status, risk of pressure injuries, comorbidities, and taken drugs were better (p ≤ 0.0077) in MPI1 than MPI2; moreover, the story of T2DM was shorter (p = 0.0026). Cox model showed an overall 13-year survival of 51.9%, and survival rates were significantly smaller in MPI2 (HR: 4.71, p = 0.0007). Finally, increased age (HR: 1.15), poorer cognitive abilities (HR: 1.26), vascular (HR: 2.15), and kidney (HR: 2.17) diseases were independently associated with death.ConclusionOur results prove that MPI predicts short-, mid-, and even long-term mortality in T2DM patients, whose death seems to be related to age and cognitive status, and even more to vascular and kidney diseases.

Validation of the Onco-MPI in predicting short-term mortality in older Indian patients with cancer

IntroductionThe number of older patients with cancer is increasing exponentially worldwide, and a similar trend has also been noted in India. The Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) strongly correlates the presence of individual comorbidities with mortality, and the Onco-MPI prognosticates patients accurately for overall mortality. However, limited studies have evaluated this index in patient populations beyond Italy. We evaluated the performance of the Onco-MPI index in predicting mortality in older Indian patients with cancer. Materials and MethodsThis observational study was conducted between October 2019 and November 2021 in the Geriatric Oncology Clinic at Tata Memorial Hospital in Mumbai, India. The data of patients aged ≥60 years with solid tumors who underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment was analysed. The study's primary aim was to calculate the Onco-MPI for patients in the study and correlate it with one-year mortality. ResultsA total of 576 patients aged ≥60 years were included in the study. The median age (range) of the population was 68 (60–90) years, and 429 (74.5%) were male. After a median follow-up of 19.2 months, 366 (63.7%) patients had died. The proportion of patients classified as low risk (0–0.46), moderate risk (0.47–0.63) and high risk (0.64–1.0) were 38% (219 patients), 37% (211 patients) and 25% (145 patients), respectively. There was a significant difference in one-year mortality rates between the low-risk patients compared to medium and high-risk patients (40.6% vs 53.1% vs 71.7%; p < 0.001). DiscussionThe current study validates the Onco-MPI as a predictive tool for estimating short-term mortality in older Indian patients with cancer. Further prospective studies need to build on this index to obtain a score with greater discrimination in the Indian population.

The Role of Multidimensional Prognostic Index to Identify Hospitalized Older Adults with COVID-19 Who Can Benefit from Remdesivir Treatment: An Observational, Prospective, Multicenter Study.

Data regarding the importance of multidimensional frailty to guide clinical decision making for remdesivir use in older patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are largely unexplored. The aim of this research was to evaluate if the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), a multidimensional frailty tool based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), may help physicians in identifying older hospitalized patients affected by COVID-19 who might benefit from the use of remdesivir. This was a multicenter, prospective study of older adults hospitalized for COVID-19 in 10 European hospitals, followed-up for 90 days after hospital discharge. A standardized CGA was performed at hospital admission and the MPI was calculated, with a final score ranging between 0 (lowest mortality risk) and 1 (highest mortality risk). We assessed survival with Cox regression, and the impact of remdesivir on mortality (overall and in hospital) with propensity score analysis, stratified by MPI = 0.50. Among 496 older adults hospitalized for COVID-19 (mean age 80 years, female 59.9%), 140 (28.2% of patients) were treated with remdesivir. During the 90 days of follow-up, 175 deaths were reported, 115 in hospital. Remdesivir treatment significantly reduced the risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval CI 0.35-0.83 in the propensity score analysis) in the sample as whole. Stratifying the population, based on MPI score, the effect was observed only in less frail participants (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.22-0.96 in propensity score analysis), but not in frailer subjects. In-hospital mortality was not influenced by remdesivir use. MPI could help to identify less frail older adults hospitalized for COVID-19 who could benefit more from remdesivir treatment in terms of long-term survival.

Multidimensional prognostic index predicts short- and long-term mortality and rehospitalizations in older patients with hip fracture.

Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), calculated on cognitive, functional, nutritional, social, pharmacological and comorbidity domains, strongly correlates with mortality in older patients. Hip fractures are a major health problem and are associated with adverse outcomes in those affected by frailty. We aimed at evaluating whether MPI is a predictor of mortality and rehospitalization in hip fracture older patients. We investigated the associations of MPI with all-cause 3- and 6-month mortality and rehospitalization in 1259 older patients admitted for hip fracture surgical treatment and managed by an orthogeriatric team [age 85years (65-109); male gender: 22%]. Overall mortality was 11,4%, 17% and 23,5% at 3, 6 and 12months from surgery (rehospitalizations: 15, 24,5 and 35,7%). MPI was associated (p < 0.001) with 3-, 6- and 12- month mortality and readmissions; Kaplan-Meier estimate for rehospitalization and survival according to MPI risk classes confirmed these results. In multiple regression analyses these associations were independent (p < 0.05) of mortality and rehospitalization-associated factors not included in the MPI, such as gender, age and post-surgical complications. Similar MPI predictive value was observed in patients undergoing endoprosthesis or other surgeries. ROC analysis confirmed that MPI was a predictor (p < 0.001) of both 3- and 6- month mortality and rehospitalization. In hip fracture older patients, MPI is a strong predictor of 3-, 6- and 12- months mortality and rehospitalization, independently of surgical treatment and post-surgical complications. Therefore, MPI should be considered a valid pre-surgical tool to identify patients with higher clinical risk of adverse outcomes.

Association between multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) and infections in a population of older people affected by COVID-19.

Only limited studies analyzed a possible relationship between frailty and infections. Our aim was to investigate the possible association between higher multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) values, a tool for evaluating multidimensional frailty, and the prevalence of infectious diseases, including antibiotics' cost and the prevalence of MDR (multidrug resistance) pathogens. Older patients, affected by COVID-19, were enrolled in the hospital of Palermo over fourmonths. 112 participants (mean age 77.6, 55.4% males) were included. After adjusting for potential confounders, frailer participants had a higher odds of any positivity to pathogens (prevalence: 61.5%, odds ratio = 15.56, p < 0.0001) compared to a prevalence of 8.6% in more robust, including MDR, and a higher costs in antibiotics. Higher MPI values, indicating frailer subjects, were associated with a higher prevalence of infections, particularly of MDR pathogens, and a consequent increase in antibiotics' cost.

Multidimensional Oncological Frailty Scale (MOFS): A New Quick-To-Use Tool for Detecting Frailty and Stratifying Risk in Older Patients with Cancer—Development and Validation Pilot Study

Frailty detection with comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is of pivotal importance in older patients with cancer to avoid over- or under-treatment and to detect those at increased risk for poor outcomes. Several tools have been developed to capture the complexity of frailty, but only a few were explicitly conceived for older adults with cancer. The study aimed at developing and validating a multidimensional, easy-to-use diagnostic tool for early-risk stratification in patients with cancer, called the Multidimensional Oncological Frailty Scale (MOFS). In this single-center prospective study, we consecutively enrolled 163 older women (age ≥ 75 years) with breast cancer, screened with a G8 score ≤ 14 during the outpatient preoperative evaluation at our breast centre, as the development cohort. Seventy patients with different types of cancer admitted to our OncoGeriatric Clinic served as the validation cohort. Using stepwise linear regression analysis, we evaluated the relationship between Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) and CGA items, and, finally, realized a screening tool based on the combination of the significant variables. The mean age of the study population was 80.4 ± 5.8 years, while the mean age of the validation cohort was 78.6 ± 6.6 years [42 women (60%)]. A composite model of the Clinical Frailty Scale, G8, and hand grip strength test showed a strong correlation with MPI (R= -0.712, p < 0.001). The MOFS accuracy in the prediction of mortality was optimal in both the development and the validation cohorts (AUC 0.82 and 0.87; p < 0.001 and 0.003, respectively). MOFS represents a new, accurate, quick-to-use frailty screening tool for stratifying the risk of mortality in geriatric cancer patients.

Management and Outcomes of Older Patients (Age ≥ 70 Years) with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma and Role of Geriatric Assessment and Oncological Multidimensional Prognostic Index (Onco-MPI) in a Real-World Setting.

Background: Incidences of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) steadily increase with age. Yet, despite the high prevalence in advanced age, older patients (pts) are underrepresented in sarcoma clinical trials and evidence-based guidelines for chemotherapy are lacking. International oncological societies suggest using geriatric tools to evaluate older patients with cancer to optimise treatment indication. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional assessment of older subjects, based on which pts can be classified as fit, vulnerable or frail. Onco-MPI (multidimensional prognostic index) is a CGA-based score which also considers tumour characteristics, classifying pts into three risk groups of death at one year: high-risk, intermediate-risk and low-risk. Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective study which aims at describing real-word management and outcomes of older pts with advanced stage STS and at assessing the ability of CGA and onco-MPI to predict survival in these pts. Consecutive pts with advanced stage STS aged 70 years or older and treated at the Istituto Oncologico Veneto from January 2009 to June 2020 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Pts' demographics, CGA assessments and tumour characteristics were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed with R version 3.4.3 Results: Out of 101 pts, with a median age of 77 years, 76 received chemotherapy (75.3%), which was anthracycline-based for 46 pts (60.5%). Anthracyclines were used in a higher proportion in fit pts (58.9% fit vs. 45.1% vulnerable vs. 12.5% frail pts). Frail pts and pts in the onco-MPI high-risk group experienced a higher rate of chemotherapy-related toxicities. Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI 11.3-17.7 months). According to CGA, the median OS was 19.53 months (95% CI 15.23-36.8) for fit pts, 12.83 months (95% CI 9.7-17.5) for vulnerable and 7.75 months (95% CI 2.73-30) for frail pts (p = 0.005). Onco-MPI confirmed a predictive value for 1-year survival with intermediate risk pts not reaching a median OS at 1 year, and high-risk pts having a median one-year OS of 11.5 months (95%CI 9.7-NA), p = 0.02. In multivariate analysis, onco-MPI and CGA were associated with survival (high risk onco-MPI: HR 5.5, 95%CI 1.25-24.7 p = 0.02; fitness at CGA HR 0.552 95% 0.314-0.973; p = 0.040) as well as chemotherapy use (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.51, p < 0.005). Conclusions: Both CGA and onco-MPI retain prognostic value for survival in pts with metastatic STS. Pts frail/vulnerable at CGA and pts within the onco-MPI high risk category should be offered an oncogeriatric management approach in order to optimise treatment-related survival and reduce toxicity.

Older People Hospitalized for COVID-19: Prognostic Role of Multidimensional Prognostic Index and Other Prognostic Scores.

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, frailty and patients’ poor outcomes seem to be closely related. However, there is no clear indication of the significance of this connection and the most adequate risk index in clinical practice. In this study, we compared a short version of MPI (multidimensional prognostic index) and other two prognostic scores for COVID-19 as potential predictors of poor patient outcomes. The patients were consecutively enrolled in the hospital of Palermo for COVID-19. The accuracy of Brief-MPI, 4C score and COVID-GRAM score in points was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% CI, taking mortality or sub-ICU admission as outcome. The study included 112 participants (mean age 77.6, 55.4% males). During a mean of 16 days of hospitalization, Brief-MPI significantly increased by 0.03 ± 0.14 (p = 0.04), whilst COVID-GRAM did not. Brief-MPI, 4C score and COVID-GRAM scores had good accuracy in predicting negative outcomes (AUC > 0.70 for all three scores). Brief-MPI was significantly associated with an increased mortality/ICU admission risk, indicating the importance of multidimensional impairment in clinical decision-making with an accuracy similar to other prognostic scores commonly used in COVID-19 study, providing information regarding domains for which interventions can be proposed.

The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients affected by knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases and highly prevalent in older people. Whilst the management of knee OA is usually multidisciplinary, the use of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for this condition is still limited. Given this background, with this systematic review, we summarized the current literature regarding the importance of CGA in people affected by knee OA. A systematic search across several databases was run until 10th April 2022 and updated on 21st November 2022 for any study investigating the use of CGA in patients with knee OA. The data were summarized descriptively. Among 295 articles initially included, three studies made in the context of the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) were included. All the three studies used the OAI multidimensional prognostic index (MPI), a composite score derived from the CGA. Higher MPI values were associated with a higher risk of falls, cardiovascular conditions, and fractures across a follow-up period of 8 years and after adjusting for potential confounders. In conclusion, in this systematic review we summarized the current evidence of CGA in knee OA, finding that the MPI, a CGA derived tool, could be useful to early find people at higher risk of conditions that are associated with knee OA and therefore that can be the target of personalized interventions for preventing these conditions.

Frailty Profile of Geriatric Patients According to the Multidimensional Prognostic Index: A Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care in the Sultanate of Oman

Frailty Profile of Geriatric Patients According to the Multidimensional Prognostic Index: A Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care in the Sultanate of Oman

569 IMPACT OF FRAILTY ON VERY LONG-TERM OUTCOME IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION (TAVI) IN A HIGH-FLOW REFERRAL CENTER: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

Abstract Background Transcatheter strategies for aortic stenosis (AS) are a therapeutic option in older patients not amenable for open heart surgery. Guidelines recommend surgical scores like the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) for risk stratification. However, the long-term predictive power of these scores in older patients is limited. Purpose To assess the impact of frailty status on the very long-term mortality in patients with severe AS evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in a high-flow and high-volume tertiary care center. Methods Consecutive patients &amp;gt;80 years referred to TAVI from January to December 2019 at our tertiary care institution were prospectively screened for frailty through a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) based on physical function and the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI). The MPI is a three-level score used to stratify frailty and risk of mortality (low, intermediate, or high risk) based on eight key domains for frailty assessment (functional and cognitive status, nutrition, mobility, and risk of pressure sores, multimorbidity, polypharmacy and co-habitation). Frailty was defined by an intermediate-high MPI. Patients were also analyzed by STS score (&amp;lt;4%: low risk; 4-8%: intermediate risk; &amp;gt;8%: high risk). All patients prospectively called at 1, 2 and 3 years from TAVI. Results Overall, 134 patients were referred for TAVI (mean age: 84±4 years; &amp;gt;90 years: 12%, women 67%). Average STS score was 4.6 ± 3.0 (low risk: 49%; intermediate: 39%, high risk: 12%). Mean SPPB was 6.3±3.7 (SPPB &amp;lt;6: 32%). Ninety-five (71%) patients belonged to the MPI-low risk group, 30 (22%) to the MPI intermediate risk group and nine (7%) to the MPI high risk group. After 3 years, 17 (12.7%) patients died, and 40 (29.9%) were hospitalized: 21 (15.7%) for cardiovascular complications (N=11 for acute heart failure, N=6 for major bleeding, N=4 for stroke). Four patients (2.9%) implanted a pacemaker. One patient (0.7%) required a de-novo intervention. At Cox multivariable analysis, only frailty (MPI intermediate-high) was associated with mortality (HR 5.42, 95% C.I. 1.88-12.11, p=0.002) while a high STS score showed a trend towards higher mortality risk (HR 1.63, 95% C.I. 0.91-2.91, p=0.101). Overall, at Kaplan Meier survival analysis, patients considered fit (non-frail) were characterized by a better prognosis irrespective of STS score (&amp;lt;8 vs &amp;gt;8). Conclusions In a prospectively enrolled cohort of old TAVI candidates, frailty status was able to identify patients at higher risk of mortality irrespective of STS risk. Frailty assessment could be a useful tool, coupled with other scores, for early detection of patients at risk of disability, and potentially, for preventing the futility of the TAVI procedure.

Preoperative dehydration identified by serum calculated osmolarity is associated with severe frailty in patients with hip fracture

Preoperative dehydration is a well-known predictor of in-hospital complications and poor functional outcomes in older patients with hip fractures. In an orthopedic and geriatric cooperative setting, we aimed to investigate whether preoperative dehydration was associated with frailty, prolonged hospital stays and short-term mortality in older patients with hip fractures. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a Danish university hospital. The study population consisted of patients 65+ years surgically treated for hip fracture. Dehydration was defined as serum calculated osmolarity above 295mmol/L. Outcomes were frailty at discharge measured by the Multidimensional Prognostic Index, hospital stay of 7 days or more and 90-day mortality. In total, 214 patients were consecutively included in the study from March 11, 2018, to August 31, 2020. The mean age was 81.2 (SD: 7.6) and 69% of the patients were women. The prevalence of preoperative dehydration was 40%. It was associated with severe frailty (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.08 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-3.90]; p=0.02) and prolonged hospital stay (OR: 2.28 [95% CI: 1.29-4.04]; p=0.02). Seven percent died when dehydrated compared to 5% in the non-dehydrated (p=0.91). Prevalence of preoperative dehydration is high among older patients with hip fractures and is associated with severe frailty and length of hospital stay. Systematic screening for dehydration on admission is advisable and may contribute to more adequate fluid management in the perioperative phase.

A Tailored Discharge Program Improves Frailty and Mood in Patients Undergoing Usual Rehabilitative Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

To investigate whether a tailored intersectoral discharge program (TIDP) impacts on multidimensional frailty, rehospitalization days, and patient-related outcome measures in older in-patients undergoing acute care and usual rehabilitative care. Randomized controlled trial of TIDP vs usual rehabilitative care with a 6-month follow-up, 2019-2020, and historical control with a 6-month follow-up, 2016-2019. Geriatric co-managed internal medicine ward of a metropolitan university hospital. One hundred-twelve multimorbid patients older than age 60years were consecutively assessed for eligibility and inclusion (age ≥60years, multimorbidity, admitted for treatment of acute disease, at least 2 geriatric syndromes requiring usual rehabilitative care, and able to consent) and signed informed consent, with 110 recruited and randomized to either TIDP or usual rehabilitative care. At discharge, 104 patients were alive in the intention-to-treat group, the 6-month follow-up was completed for 91 patients. A historical control group of 468 patients was included for comparison. TIDP as intervention included contact with treating general practitioner to discuss the further treatment plan, a structured medical and lifestyle counseling to patients and caregivers at admission as well as a discharge program with internist, geriatrician, and general practitioner in shared decision making with patients. Fifty-four patients underwent TIDP, 53 patients underwent usual rehabilitative care only. Rehospitalization days at follow-up as primary endpoint; multidimensional frailty and prognosis (Multidimensional Prognostic Index, Geriatric Depression Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, quality of life, falls, mortality, home care service need, and need of long-term care at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-up as secondary endpoints. TIDP (median age 76.0years, 56% female) showed significantly improved Multidimensional Prognostic Index scores at discharge compared with usual rehabilitative care (median age 78.5years, 58% female) (0.43 vs 0.49, P= .011). Compared with usual rehabilitative care, TIDP improved self-confidence (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale 13.9 vs 12.4, P= .009) and mood (Geriatric Depression Scale 4 vs 5, P= .027) at follow-up. Compared with historical control (median age 77.0years, 39 % female), usual rehabilitative care patients showed significantly lower rehospitalization rates (53% vs 70%, P= .002) and lower mortality rates (13% vs 32%, P < .001). A feasible TIDP improves frailty and mood in advanced age. In older patients undergoing potentially disabling acute treatments, usual rehabilitative care significantly reduces rehospitalization rates. Therefore, implementing geriatric treatment in general is useful to improve outcomes in older in-patients and a tailored discharge program can further increase the benefit for this frail population.